[Xemaul]

What's the point of us being able to cut them when there are NONE available.

Just been wondering this for a LONG time.

[evan 90210]

hmm i dont see why not, if we members can trade them there why shouldnt we be able to chop them there

[Ray]

one answer....Autoers

[evan 90210]

[quote name='Ray' date='Jun 7 2006, 03:49 PM' post='293076']
one answer....Autoers
[/qbut why have autoers at maple trees when you can get yew trees?

[Xemaul]

Ho Ho Ho Auto'ers?

How can they affect that?

[Tao]

Wat would the Autoers do? Since we could Firemake Maples, coudnt we cut maples?

[Sir Fisher]

I reckon the fact maples are P2P is simply to encourage F2P people who get to the required WC level to become a member so they can get at the maples.

Though i don't think its worked out like that in the case of many players, who insist on cutting lower level trees en-mass to get the required level to cut yews.

Im happy with maples being P2P to be honest. Making them F2P will likely increase the amount of autoers, create another market on F2P which is pointless really - F2P doesnt need to suck more money into it from P2P.

Ask yourself this: what on earth can a F2P person use willow logs for apart from woodcutting exp and firemaking exp? the only sensible answer is to make money - and what would be the point in giving F2P another option when it came to making money? If they want that other ability, they should become members.

NB: The forseeable problem with autoers is that they could cut willows on a large scale, to get levels up even quicker for yews, or to sell in the newly created market oppertunity.