Toggle shoutbox
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Page 1 of 1
Only 2?
#1
Posted 18 July 2007 - 06:54 PM
I think we should be able to mroe than 2 images in our sigs.
Maybe something like 4, as long as we keep it below the max size. (Like using the spoiler tags)
Maybe I just got hit on the heads to many times, what do you think?
Maybe something like 4, as long as we keep it below the max size. (Like using the spoiler tags)
Maybe I just got hit on the heads to many times, what do you think?
"If it's worth doing, then its worth overdoing"
Eat, drink, and be metal, for tommorow we die.
Eat, drink, and be metal, for tommorow we die.
All it takes for evil to triumph is for a few good men to do nothing
#4
Posted 19 July 2007 - 01:14 AM
I'm not sure about increasing the limit of signatures, but I would like to have the maximum size, in pixels, changed. That way, people could do things such as vert sigs, for their actual signature, or possibly having a separate rule for vert sigs. Such as a normal signature can be a maximum of 200 pixels high by 475 pixels wide, like it is now, and vert sigs could be a maximum of 400 pixels high by 125 pixels wide maybe? Those are just my thoughts though.
-Raganork
-Raganork

"Nothing is permanent in this wicked world that we live in, not even our troubles." ~Charles Chaplin
Rest in peace Dan O'canna 1953-2007 ~ A devoted leader, loving husband, and caring friend.
Signature created by me.
#8
Posted 20 July 2007 - 06:57 AM
Quote
Don't like it? Make your own site with your own rules then.
Take it easy man, he's only making a suggestion. Anywayz, I can't see why anyone would need more than two sigs. When people look at topics they want to read the comments and not look at endless sigs.
#9
Posted 20 July 2007 - 04:58 PM
I agree, the sites that have people with 15 underbanners get annoying.
I do think that a rule should be added with something like this:
... Because I have some more text I want to put in my sig, and I am not using up as much bandwidth/load speed as the people with scrolling underbanners and movie sigs.
I do think that a rule should be added with something like this:
Quote
You may have two images in your signature, with 5 lines of text, or, you may have one image in your signature, with 7 lines of text.
... Because I have some more text I want to put in my sig, and I am not using up as much bandwidth/load speed as the people with scrolling underbanners and movie sigs.

Supercalifragilistic, own the nOOb and go balistic!! - Exantra
Don't be afraid. Al Kaida tried to like... use us for like... bandwidth.... stuff. - Silver
Avvy by Fishermanim
#10
Posted 20 July 2007 - 10:11 PM
There should just be a total pixel size limit, like if you had 5 sigs, but they were small, then that would be allowed. Like how I'm unable to post my goal sigs because I have 3 or 4 of them that I want in my sig.
As long as they're small, they should be allowed.
As long as they're small, they should be allowed.
#11
Posted 20 July 2007 - 10:15 PM
Lamborgini, having 5 100px images takes longer to load, and takes up more webspace/bandwidth than having 1 500px image.

Supercalifragilistic, own the nOOb and go balistic!! - Exantra
Don't be afraid. Al Kaida tried to like... use us for like... bandwidth.... stuff. - Silver
Avvy by Fishermanim
Page 1 of 1

Sign In
Register
Help



MultiQuote











