Benjy
Sep 17 2007, 10:53 AM
This fake was created in 4minutes 37seconds 34miliseconds (according to my stopwatch, may be one or two seconds off)
This is the quickest fake I made. I have a great urge to make a big one like I used to (they were of fair quality) but I like this, its sexy for 4 mins, but I guess I should have curved his legs more and changed the body a bit, but I rly wanted under 5 mins.
Anyhow, rate.

Im replacing my frog undersig with this one ;]
beyblade1312
Sep 17 2007, 05:11 PM
its ok but its a little small....
but i would rate..
-7/10
but good fake
Imodio
Sep 17 2007, 05:27 PM
hmm... i shall rate it 4/10,
becouse the image size is too small, the graphics sucks (ya, you told it), the text is ok, i say the rating is ok, just try to make a bigger one, and try to edit it a bitty, mostly the legs, and it will be perfect
Benjy
Sep 17 2007, 11:18 PM
QUOTE(beyblade1312 @ Sep 18 2007, 03:11 AM)

-7/10
I hope you don't mean negative 7!
But thanks guys anyway
Morril
Sep 18 2007, 01:09 AM
Extremely small and I can hardly see the legs. Looks like a failed copy and paste attempt tbh
4/10 sadly. Far to small.
Lamborgini8
Sep 18 2007, 01:52 AM
Tbh, it sort of looks like all you did was stand in front of the horse and erase part of your legs
Also, it would look better if he's holding the sword out while he says 'Onward'
Kev
Sep 18 2007, 04:00 AM
Don't really like it, Too small, bad quality tbh.
I don't think you should try to make real fast fakes.
Rs4eva
Sep 18 2007, 09:57 PM
Fake Rate= 4/10
I dont really even get it, graphics suck.
Sorry, but it really was a bad copy and paste attempt...
And what Kev said, you shouldnt try to make a fake according to speed, if we did that, everyone would be able to make a fake in less than 20 seconds.
Fakes are suppose to be funny..
Benjy
Sep 19 2007, 12:09 AM
QUOTE(Rs4eva @ Sep 19 2007, 07:57 AM)

I dont really even get it, graphics suck.
Fakes are suppose to be funny..
This is what I don't like about some comments.
'Graphics suck' how so?
'Don't get it' my problem how?
'Fakes are supposed to be funny' no, fakes are supposed to be whatever you want them to be.
At least the other posters had the decency to be constructive.
Kev
Sep 19 2007, 12:38 AM
QUOTE(qudeb @ Sep 18 2007, 05:09 PM)

QUOTE(Rs4eva @ Sep 19 2007, 07:57 AM)

I dont really even get it, graphics suck.
Fakes are suppose to be funny..
This is what I don't like about some comments.
'Graphics suck' how so?
'Don't get it' my problem how?
'Fakes are supposed to be funny' no, fakes are supposed to be whatever you want them to be.
At least the other posters had the decency to be constructive.
Bad graphics 'cause its a little 109x88 picture, He's not bending his legs like he would on a horse, and so forth.
If people don't get it , they don't get it. Never said it was your problem.
And no, there is no rule saying they have to be funny (atleast none that I saw) but i'm going to say that 99.9% are, or trying to be. It's basically the point of faking.
People are constructive do you not know the definition? Un-constructive(right prefix?)posts would be like: "LULZ 0/10 SUX!!!!!!"
Seriously. People are telling you what they think is wrong with it in their posts. You just have to read then and you'll know how so.
Benjy
Sep 19 2007, 12:49 AM
Other people are telling me what I did wrong. He is just saying things with nothing to back it up. If you respond with HOW it is bad etc. Then thats constructive, what he said was pretty much
"LULZ 0/10 SUX!!!!!!"
Kev
Sep 19 2007, 01:58 AM
QUOTE(qudeb @ Sep 18 2007, 05:49 PM)

Other people are telling me what I did wrong. He is just saying things with nothing to back it up. If you respond with HOW it is bad etc. Then thats constructive, what he said was pretty much
"LULZ 0/10 SUX!!!!!!"
HOW it is bad? It's bad because the graphics aren't good. It's even more constructive if you say specifics.
Benjy
Sep 19 2007, 02:26 AM
Yes but the point is, you are saying this, not him. I have no problem with anyone else comments.
Kev
Sep 19 2007, 03:55 AM
I just don't see the point why you don't like those kind comments. He's stated why. But meh.
Benjy
Sep 19 2007, 04:28 AM
He only said 'Graphics Suck'
There is no 'why' in that?
but nvm.
evan 90210
Sep 19 2007, 02:17 PM
2/10, all you rly did is stand next to horse and erase your legs or cut and copy yourself on it, i cant tell because its too small.
Weekend
Sep 19 2007, 10:40 PM
I don't like it really. It's not you, its the quality and time spent on making that. I can point out a few improvements you could make.
Just please, next time you decide to make a fake, put some effort into it.
~Weekend Dude~
I_WC
Sep 20 2007, 10:18 PM
Ok, 1.7/10. Fast Fakes arn't that impressive.
Spire
Sep 20 2007, 10:56 PM
Some of the pixels of the leg are visible where they shouldn't, he needs to bend his legs, and it looks as if he has a sword growing out of his chest. Take your time on decent fakes instead of numerous quick fakes.
To rs4eva: Fakes can be whatever the maker wants them to be
To some other posters:'ALL U DID WAS ERAIS AND IT SUX OLOLOL 0/10' doesn't make you any cooler 
Sorry...
4/10
Neilo5880
Oct 7 2007, 07:36 AM
Not great, looks more like one of those glitch doo-hickeys
4/10 Sorry man.
Beyblade
Oct 7 2007, 12:57 PM
i like it
5/10 not bad for a first
Chriswater5
Feb 23 2008, 01:21 PM
Legs are 2 small and stubby.
Basherbelding
May 28 2008, 07:07 PM
Pretty simple, But its effective. 6/10.
darth_knukle
Jun 29 2008, 11:46 PM
After reading the first page, I thought this might be moved to debates. The last few were just back and forth arguments
But seriously it's not that bad....maybe a 4.5/10. Yeah, it's small, yeah, the laegs are incorrect, yeah, the sword's kinda wierd......but somehow, I like it.
Gir
Jul 20 2008, 03:19 AM
0/10
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.