It seems we havn't got any HD banners on this site, and I was wondering if it would be worth it if we replaced them?
I have got a few screenies worth putting up and might upload them later on.
Otter
Apr 5 2009, 02:55 PM
I would gladly help
Nick
Apr 5 2009, 03:33 PM
If you submit banners that are good I'm sure we could get them up on the site. Just keep them consistent with the current ones (no text, not crowded with players, etc.)
Vipey
Apr 5 2009, 04:10 PM
To be honest, I don't think I could stand looking at HD everytime I came here. I play on SD.
Overdoziz
Apr 5 2009, 07:11 PM
Get me a pc that can actually run HD and i would be happy to help.
(yes, my pc is poo)
Bloodthir
Apr 5 2009, 10:35 PM
Some of our banners are just crappy pictures. Someone out there is really bad at video game photography.
Xemaul
Apr 6 2009, 06:29 AM
ill go re-download WoW
Row
Apr 6 2009, 10:04 AM
Saebjorn
Apr 6 2009, 10:20 AM
I'm not quite sure about the size, but I cut out the chat, compass, inventory, etc from these screenshots that you can crop to suit a banner:
They both have crappy quality (don't know why) but when you size them down it looks ok.
Spoiler - Banner 1:
Spoiler - Banner 2:
--- Edit: Sorry about the missing line. I can fill that in if you need.
Maarten
Apr 6 2009, 12:01 PM
Great job. But I'm not sure if I should waste my time on them with Shamrock coming up. Maybe we can use them for that though.
QUOTE(Bloodthir @ Apr 6 2009, 12:35 AM)
Some of our banners are just crappy pictures. Someone out there is really bad at video game photography.
Go to your profile, you can disable banners you don't like. And if you're going to complain about the pictures, show you can do better before judging others.
kreotis
Apr 6 2009, 08:23 PM
Shamrock will require a different style of banners anyway
Tyranno
Apr 6 2009, 09:28 PM
runecrypt requires new HD bananas
Rob
Apr 6 2009, 10:14 PM
I'll let you see my HD Banana.
kreotis
Apr 7 2009, 01:27 AM
HD is for fags
Tyranno
Apr 7 2009, 01:30 AM
the balance must be contained
Matthew
Apr 7 2009, 02:12 AM
The banners we have now are original. KEEP THEM
kreotis
Apr 7 2009, 04:50 AM
I sense a disturbance in the force
Tyranno
Apr 7 2009, 01:00 PM
Fun Dip you bro
bling_masta8
Apr 11 2009, 08:42 AM
QUOTE(kreotis @ Apr 6 2009, 09:23 PM)
Shamrock will require a different style of banners anyway
I got a feeling Shamrock isn't going to be released for some time, so this can act as a temporary measure.
QUOTE(-Matt- @ Apr 7 2009, 03:12 AM)
The banners we have now are original. KEEP THEM
We could keep them and add new ones at the same time.
Maarten
Apr 11 2009, 08:43 PM
QUOTE(bling_masta8 @ Apr 11 2009, 10:42 AM)
QUOTE(kreotis @ Apr 6 2009, 09:23 PM)
Shamrock will require a different style of banners anyway
I got a feeling Shamrock isn't going to be released for some time, so this can act as a temporary measure.
QUOTE(-Matt- @ Apr 7 2009, 03:12 AM)
The banners we have now are original. KEEP THEM
We could keep them and add new ones at the same time.
I don't really see why it's necesairy though. There's nothing wrong with these. Besides, who says your feeling is right? (I'm not even sure if it is)
Otter
Apr 12 2009, 03:19 PM
QUOTE(Maarten @ Apr 11 2009, 04:43 PM)
QUOTE(bling_masta8 @ Apr 11 2009, 10:42 AM)
QUOTE(kreotis @ Apr 6 2009, 09:23 PM)
Shamrock will require a different style of banners anyway
I got a feeling Shamrock isn't going to be released for some time, so this can act as a temporary measure.
QUOTE(-Matt- @ Apr 7 2009, 03:12 AM)
The banners we have now are original. KEEP THEM
We could keep them and add new ones at the same time.
I don't really see why it's necesairy though. There's nothing wrong with these. Besides, who says your feeling is right? (I'm not even sure if it is)
What does necesairy mean? I'm sooooo confused now
bling_masta8
Apr 12 2009, 07:35 PM
QUOTE(Maarten @ Apr 11 2009, 09:43 PM)
QUOTE(bling_masta8 @ Apr 11 2009, 10:42 AM)
QUOTE(kreotis @ Apr 6 2009, 09:23 PM)
Shamrock will require a different style of banners anyway
I got a feeling Shamrock isn't going to be released for some time, so this can act as a temporary measure.
QUOTE(-Matt- @ Apr 7 2009, 03:12 AM)
The banners we have now are original. KEEP THEM
We could keep them and add new ones at the same time.
I don't really see why it's necesairy though. There's nothing wrong with these. Besides, who says your feeling is right? (I'm not even sure if it is)
O rly? From what I've read, the developers are saying it's nowhere near done so I assumed it's long off.
Kev
Apr 12 2009, 10:26 PM
QUOTE(bling_masta8 @ Apr 12 2009, 12:35 PM)
QUOTE(Maarten @ Apr 11 2009, 09:43 PM)
QUOTE(bling_masta8 @ Apr 11 2009, 10:42 AM)
QUOTE(kreotis @ Apr 6 2009, 09:23 PM)
Shamrock will require a different style of banners anyway
I got a feeling Shamrock isn't going to be released for some time, so this can act as a temporary measure.
QUOTE(-Matt- @ Apr 7 2009, 03:12 AM)
The banners we have now are original. KEEP THEM
We could keep them and add new ones at the same time.
I don't really see why it's necesairy though. There's nothing wrong with these. Besides, who says your feeling is right? (I'm not even sure if it is)
O rly? From what I've read, the developers are saying it's nowhere near done so I assumed it's long off.
10 months ago someone said it was like 88% complete
Mangr0v3
Apr 13 2009, 12:59 AM
wasn't shamrock cancelled?
RSK
Apr 13 2009, 01:05 AM
QUOTE(Mangr0v3 @ Apr 13 2009, 01:59 AM)
wasn't shamrock cancelled?
bling_masta8
Apr 13 2009, 10:08 AM
QUOTE(Kev @ Apr 12 2009, 11:26 PM)
QUOTE(bling_masta8 @ Apr 12 2009, 12:35 PM)
QUOTE(Maarten @ Apr 11 2009, 09:43 PM)
QUOTE(bling_masta8 @ Apr 11 2009, 10:42 AM)
QUOTE(kreotis @ Apr 6 2009, 09:23 PM)
Shamrock will require a different style of banners anyway
I got a feeling Shamrock isn't going to be released for some time, so this can act as a temporary measure.
QUOTE(-Matt- @ Apr 7 2009, 03:12 AM)
The banners we have now are original. KEEP THEM
We could keep them and add new ones at the same time.
I don't really see why it's necesairy though. There's nothing wrong with these. Besides, who says your feeling is right? (I'm not even sure if it is)
O rly? From what I've read, the developers are saying it's nowhere near done so I assumed it's long off.
10 months ago someone said it was like 88% complete
I see, guess I was wrong then
QUOTE(runescapeking @ Apr 13 2009, 02:05 AM)
QUOTE(Mangr0v3 @ Apr 13 2009, 01:59 AM)
wasn't shamrock cancelled?
Yes, yes it was cancelled.
Maarten
Apr 13 2009, 10:29 AM
QUOTE(Otter @ Apr 12 2009, 05:19 PM)
QUOTE(Maarten @ Apr 11 2009, 04:43 PM)
QUOTE(bling_masta8 @ Apr 11 2009, 10:42 AM)
QUOTE(kreotis @ Apr 6 2009, 09:23 PM)
Shamrock will require a different style of banners anyway
I got a feeling Shamrock isn't going to be released for some time, so this can act as a temporary measure.
QUOTE(-Matt- @ Apr 7 2009, 03:12 AM)
The banners we have now are original. KEEP THEM
We could keep them and add new ones at the same time.
I don't really see why it's necesairy though. There's nothing wrong with these. Besides, who says your feeling is right? (I'm not even sure if it is)
What does necesairy mean? I'm sooooo confused now
Shit, should really use that spell check more. I spelled that all wrong. Don't see why it's necessary, there I got it right.
Silver
Apr 14 2009, 12:44 AM
Its ok. You don't normally speak English.
We forgive you, and all of your Dutch ways.
Bliz
Apr 14 2009, 01:09 PM
Add new ones, sure, why not, you can pick them yourself anyway
Maybe we need some different style banners too, I'm thinking femalez?
Row
Apr 14 2009, 04:41 PM
QUOTE(Bliz @ Apr 14 2009, 11:09 PM)
Add new ones, sure, why not, you can pick them yourself anyway
Maybe we need some different style banners too, I'm thinking femalez?
lawl bliz we definitely need sum nice hawt femalez!!
bling_masta8
Apr 17 2009, 10:00 PM
Sorry for the massive delay, but here are my batch of banners
Spoiler - 15 banners:
Sorry, no femaelz
Row
Apr 18 2009, 02:08 AM
nice work i like them
Spire
Apr 18 2009, 02:49 AM
QUOTE(Bliz @ Apr 14 2009, 11:09 PM)
Maybe we need some different style banners too, I'm thinking femalez?
i'm not sure i'd get pleasure out of those banners like you guys would
Bloodthir
Jun 24 2009, 10:45 AM
WAT'S UP WITH THE FIRST ONE. GOSH. WHOSE LEGS ARE THOSE. GIVE ME NAMES.
bling_masta8
Jun 24 2009, 11:58 AM
That runes prices dude (i think) in Grand Exchange.
Overdoziz
Jun 24 2009, 12:49 PM
The fifth looks like the guy is taking a dump. There all really nice though
Cmafai
Jul 24 2009, 03:26 PM
Crud. Those are all really nice, but they're the wrong size
Any chance you kept the original screenshots?
bling_masta8
Jul 24 2009, 09:06 PM
Yea got the screenies (although all are 1440x900 so I will have to resize them again). Any chance you got the new "cryptbasic.psd"?
Too Insan3
Jul 25 2009, 12:40 AM
Great job i like the 10th one
Matthew
Jul 25 2009, 12:59 AM
QUOTE(Spire @ Apr 18 2009, 02:49 AM)
QUOTE(Bliz @ Apr 14 2009, 11:09 PM)
Maybe we need some different style banners too, I'm thinking femalez?
i'm not sure i'd get pleasure out of those banners like you guys would
But there are tons of male ones that we don't like, so its our turn.
bling_masta8
Jul 26 2009, 06:27 PM
Here they are again, this time with proper dimensions and with one more addition.
Hate to break it to you (actually I do quite like to), but Runescape HD sucks. Keep it standard detail if you want it to look good. If I wanted to look at a game with graphics I would play Far Cry 2.
bling_masta8
Jul 26 2009, 07:01 PM
QUOTE(kreotis @ Jul 26 2009, 07:56 PM)
Hate to break it to you, but Runescape HD sucks.
Fixed It's a RS site, so I went for a RS theme, and since HD is "supposed" to be better than normal, I chose that (and also due to the fact that all my screenies are in HD since it's release.
kreotis
Jul 26 2009, 08:33 PM
Your problem lies there.
Overdoziz
Jul 26 2009, 08:37 PM
HD looks better than the low detail version of RuneScape, how can you not see that? Some textures on non-updated monsters and NPCs look awful but the rest looks much better.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.