Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Rate the Sig Above You
RuneCrypt Forum > General Board > Graphic Art
Pages: 1, 2
Saebjorn
How much simpler can it get?
  • Rate the Sig of the person above you.
  • This includes words and/or under it, etc.
  • This includes undersigs.
  • Be mature and sensible.
  • Rules are subject to change at any time.
Go for it!
Gir
Laughed at the ironic thing, nice time shift sig, if that is what it is.
Made me laugh so hard at the Control+F+U

Andddd I have a little bit of a problemmmmmmmm, my signature was removed, and I can't edit it. >_+
Morril
no signature no rating.
Matt
Who doesn't love MLG tongue.gif. Serves its purpose well as an advertisement. 8/10 for a 'good' moving gif, their usually pretty awful in signatures.

@Gir, i'll look into that for you.
Dinty
0/10 that's total crap laugh.gif wub.gif Time for a new one!
kreotis
6/7 Your style keeps my attention

This should be in the graphics section tbh
Drerven
8/10
Only loses points because I think the render was to small and I don't like Pokemon... And Dinty's sig is in the GFX section..
Mangr0v3
7/10 - almost missed it on the right, black text doesn't fit in some places there.
Kevinboos
Eh, the render dosen't really match the background, but the text is actually not bad imo.

6.5/10
kreotis
QUOTE(Drerven @ Mar 25 2009, 12:05 AM) *

And Dinty's sig is in the GFX section..

topic not sig you 12 year old
Drerven
OH d'oh I should try to post on forums when I'm half asleep because I say stupid stuff like that. eep.gif
I wish I was 12 because then I wouldn't have any real responsibilities.
Overdoziz
Oh well, I'll jusr rate Kevins sig.
RuneScape sig: 0/10 Kevinism: 10/10: overall 9/10

What?
Broli
Awesomesauce. Not sure if this sounds right, but I like the saturation of the signature. Colors look nice in my opinion as well. I also hear it's a good game which I've been told I need to get. :X 9/10
Mangr0v3
8/10. Pretty good.
Tyranno
its, like, really bad
Drerven
I like the effects on the balloon. I like the colors itself on the text but not the glow effect behind it. There is also way to much empty grey. 5/10
Saebjorn
3/10

The text doesn't work so well and the whole sig appears to be a raw, coloured C4D with erased edges. 6/10 if you made the C4D yourself.
Row
1/10 you suck stfu
kreotis
row 4 admin 7/7
pngndn2010
8.5/10
Neat design...but I don't get what it's supposed to be.
Mangr0v3
3/10, not artistic, lulz.
Broli
4/10

The render itself is nice, but it isn't rendered very well. It is pixely in some areas such as in the white outline which doesn't look good. The render also does not blend or go with the background at all. The text also doesn't fit in with the signature really.
Saebjorn
7/10

The C4D's seem just placed and opacity lowered, but the overall feel is quite nice.

As for the undersig and text, I don't know what to think. (No offence or anything intended).
Foo
6/10, but I do like the Google sign... Just not a big fan of Pokemon
Tao
Exceeded the limits, por favor. Too much going on, and I really hate the WhatPulse sig.

5/10
Foo
QUOTE(Tao @ Jun 5 2009, 12:25 PM) *

I really hate the WhatPulse sig.

Why? sad.gif

Btw 4/10... I don't really get it
kreotis
Sig is way too tall for my liking. Should go with a more traditional forum sig setup.
Tao
Oh god, overblured :A

8/10
Saebjorn
3/10. Looks ok, but I don't really get it.
Tao
QUOTE(Saebjorn @ Jun 18 2009, 11:24 PM) *

3/10. Looks ok, but I don't really get it.

Why dont you dumbasses look at the text in the corner "IREPRESENT."

Your sig is very messy but color blends in very well. I hate morse code with google. Overall, its a 6/10
Spire
8/10

the render is cute wub.gif
Saebjorn
3.5/10. Simple enough, but it is hard to see. I am also not a fan of the incorrect punctuation in the text. UNACCEPTABLE PERSON. *points.*

(Oh, and I saw the iRepresent, but I don't know what that is.)
RSK
charmander is pretty cool,

i dont see the relevance of "google" in morse code, but its not bad

overall 7/10
RaDave
QUOTE(runescapeking @ Jun 20 2009, 03:56 PM) *

charmander is pretty cool,

i dont see the relevance of "google" in morse code, but its not bad

overall 7/10



8/10! .. Cos im in it laugh.gif
Bliz
Add a 3 to the title please smile.gif

Bit boring sig but it does the job I guess tongue.gif
7/10

btw - i have a randomizer.
Overdoziz
@the #Cryptirc one,

it's dead sad.gif 0/10
Saebjorn
Looks cool-ish. Has the only relevant thing easy to see, with you being a Forum Leader.

8/10.
sonic718
5/10
the effects are a bit thrown around and its too messy, it would look better with no text and the blending needs work.
kreotis
Needs improvement, 3/6
sonic718
don't like the way the lighting is in it, it seems to be coming from behind the render while the front side of the render is too bright, try giving it a background, remove the text, or just remove the underline it does nothing to make your text look better it makes it look worse. 4/10 I like the effects
Saebjorn
QUOTE(sonic718 @ Jun 30 2009, 09:35 PM) *

5/10
the effects are a bit thrown around and its too messy, it would look better with no text and the blending needs work.


I know about the text, but I couldn't have anybody ripping it, could I?

I'm not a fan of that sort of sig so I would give you a really poor rating like 3, but in terms of the sig itself I would say 6/10.
Xemaul
CHAHMANDA HURTTTT
13/27

it's okay...
sonic718
RIP Billy Mays...
I like the starwars dead jedi effect you got there 8/10
bling_masta8
Quite a lot going on in the sig... but I like the left quarter of it.

7/10
darth irule
9/10

I like it a lot.
Spire
20/10, sexiest signature on the internet to date.
Saebjorn
4/10. Though it is in HD, the edges of everything are too...dodgy. What if you put anti-aliasing on highest for a couplea minutes and make it like that?
Saml
8/10
smile.gif i like it
Saebjorn
5/10

Cewl, but the horizon and sky are bleh compared to the grass.
Overdoziz
You've got your sig rated enogh times already >_>
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.