QUOTE(kol @ Aug 29 2009, 06:04 PM)

So, we all hear the theories.
No, we don’t. A theory, in the broad sense of the word, is a statement devised to explain observations. Therefore, by the very definition of the word, a theory needs evidence backing it up and a substantial amount if it is be taken seriously. No so called ‘theory’ about the end of the world in 2012 has any of this, therefore there are no theories like you have stated.
QUOTE
The sun exploding a flare into our faces. (Burn...)
If you knew anything about star formation and their lifecycles, you would know that that is simply not possible. Our star is 4.57 billion years old. How is this known? Radiometric dating of the oldest solar system material has returned a date of 4.57 billion years. This means that our sun (as we know it) will continue to shine for approximately another 5.4 billion years and unless you and you alone stand as the only human to defy the laws of nature by not at all aging, you won’t live that long. After this period, the Sun will swell up into a Red Giant, engulfing the orbits of Mercury, Venus and probably Earth. Even if the actual body of the star doesn’t reach our orbit, the planet will be vaporised by the intense heat.
Earth has protection against solar flares, it’s called the magnetosphere. Unless you’re in a spacecraft or on a planet that has no magnet field, you need not worry. Oh and a flare isn’t like a huge fireball coming towards us, if there was any misunderstanding there.
So the sun will not explode and ‘burn’ us, let alone explode a flare.
QUOTE
Meteors destroying us. (Texas wins in the end...)
A meteor is the streak of light that is the result of a meteoroid disintegrating in the Earth’s atmosphere. For a meteor to destroy the Earth is just absurd and quite plainly, impossible. I think the word you mean is asteroid, in which case you are still wrong. Asteroids just aren’t big enough to destroy the planet. If an asteroid traveled fast enough, say at the speed of light (which is impossible, an object with mass can’t travel at the speed of light, but let’s just say it does) then it would have an infinite amount of energy, meaning that when it slammed into the Earth, the planet would be completely destroyed. However, the fastest moving asteroid that we know of clocks in at just over 81,000mph and the theoretical limit on speed at our distance from the Sun is roughly 100,000mph, so don’t go round telling your friends that we’re doomed just yet.
Furthermore even at 100,000mph, asteroids just simply aren’t big enough to destroy the planet. Unless you want to include dwarf planets in the ‘asteroid’ bracket, which would be rather naughty of you. However, if you meant dwarf planets too, then you’re still wrong. Earth has shown in the past than it is more than able to deal with impacts that are huge. The Moon was most likely formed when a planetary body the size of Mars slammed into the early Earth, yet Earth is still here today. What was the size of Theia? Well Mars’ mass is 0.15 that of Earth and we shall assume Theia had roughly the same density as Mars (it would probably be greater, as it would have formed in the same general area as Earth, which has a greater density than Mars, but hey, this isn’t some deep scientific study). Now what is the size of the largest known asteroid in the solar system (remember now, this includes dwarf planets because we’re rebels yo)? 1.67 × 1022 kg is the figure for Eris and 6.4185 × 1023 kg for Mars. You do the calculations, Mars and therefore Theia is/was a LOT bigger than Eris and if the Earth wasn’t destroyed by Theia, you’ve got nothing to worry about.
QUOTE
Judgment by, God, dammit why do I care?
God doesn’t exist.
QUOTE
Evolution, as if.
Humankind now tops the food chain, we are the world’s foremost super predator. Now, previously, that didn’t provide much safety for a species’ survival, but we now have the means to control this planet and all other animals around us, so the prospect of man becoming extinct by means of evolution is laughable.
Also, do you know anything about evolution? Do you know what timescale it operates on? Do you really think that within 3 years, a new type of life form will evolve, become sentient, master fire, and develop the technology to wipe us out without it even being noticed?
QUOTE
Mass Suicide, Helter Skelter!!!
Yes, people will just decide to commit suicide for no reason.
Bumper cars. I can give an example of a fairground ride too, want to go on?
QUOTE
Nuclear destruction (Hello I am Kim Jong Il, I own all your Nukes)
No. Just no.
QUOTE
[i]My debate is, through everything, and all the supposed evidence (the little valid stuff I've been able to believe, smite me

)
There is no debate, because there needs to be another point of view in order for this to qualify as a debate.
QUOTE
Do you think 2012 will be the end of the world, or are we freakin out over Y2K all over again?
No.
QUOTE
Yes way or go 'way, anyone think 2012, aka the end of the world will actually happen?
No.
QUOTE
Some part of me says it will.
Cut that part out.
QUOTE
But maybe even though the Aztecs had an all perfect correct calender that kicked our asses in prophecizing events, maybe when it ends, that just means the Aztecs end, cause you know they're stalking you at night, under your bed, in your closet, plotting with the boogeyman.
No they didn’t. You can’t prophesise anything, because there is no way tell the future. Well, that’s not exactly true. If you knew the exact position and speed of all particles in the Universe then you could know the future, but seeing as though it is impossible to know both the exact position and speed of a particle due to the uncertainty principle, then that method isn’t exactly going to come into action anytime soon.
QUOTE
And Kreo is a Phoronidaing god.